/lit/ - Literature

>>17642251
You got it anon. The "God" of Genesis is basically a noxifer- a darkness disseminating deity, and the serpent is the luxifer, a light-bearing deity.
Are mortal hominids just herd animals that need a dominant deity to keep them in ignorant bliss, or are they capable of following a Prometheus into an arduous battle against death, equipped with limited but developing technical knowledge?

He mistakes attacking Christianity as disproving religion as a whole.

Everyone of a moderate intellect or maybe even a low intellect can realize it's impossible to really make a boat that has every animal on it.

Everyone knows god didn't actually write that book, humans did.

Everyone knows humans are wrong all the time.

None of this is certain proof of god being fake.

my crystal changing ceremony is nigh, and I have to don the earth crystal but my plan was to have a mud bath at a spa but now all the spas are closed and I don't know what I should do.

>>14649489
>be me
>don't give a fuck about what you think

>>14268737
pointing out spelling errors is a lowly pursuit of weakling intellects. The purpose of language is to communicate meaning. If you understood my statement, then the purpose was fulfilled.

Language is just a tool, don't get so wrapped up in words that you lose sight of meaning.

>>14258771
why wouldn't it? they need to pay me if they want my defense services.

No atheist is capable of beating me in an argument.

>>14188480
If they could, they wouldn't be an atheist.

So, NO.

>>13569279
You refuse to accept anything outside of the binary brainwashing you've been subjected to, and you make these elaborate extraneous scenarios in a desperate attempt to fit me into one box or another.

At the store, you ask me if you should have a snickers or a reese's pieces. I merely say it makes no difference to me. But you just won't let it go. With anger in your voice, you inform me that if I don't choose, you will choose a snickers and it will be my fault.

But you haven't managed to transform me into a binary thinker through wordgames, you've remained what you are all along, a binary prisoner who can only choose between snickers and reese's. Other people's choices are not my own, even if they throw tantrums.

>>11724058
>But then doesn't it become technologized?
I think you're viewing art as something that is to be consumed. The solution should be in my view that art is something that we participate in as much as consume. With luck, technology will make this possible and social media could redeem itself. Think of reddit's /r/place art experiment. Real time collaborative pixel art over a massive canvas. Things like this, installed as extensions of democracy. Personal expression as outlet and shared vision. Insta and snap and facebook and them are only the absolute worst of humanity, the selfish, childish desire for approval regardless of whether the presented cause has merit. The other contemporary movement, the woke phenomenon, is a completely mercenary free-for-all grab for social status and dollars.

Incidentally you're terribly cynical. More than I ever was. I suppose this is a good thing, but not a healthy one, and hopefully temporary.