/lit/ - Literature

>>4640165
>pseudo science
what is the curve bell

http://nig.gr/7d6
>This differential, on the individual and population level, explains a large portion of the social outcome difference. Within populations, intelligence is highly heritable. As such, the behavioral genetic default is that this differential also has a high heritability. It could be otherwise, though. As such, facts on the ground were explored and environmental explanations were evaluated. The facts include: (1) the difference is a true difference in psychometric intelligence, (2) it largely represents a difference in the general factor, (3) it has shown great persistence, having decreased little in the last century, (4) there is currently regression with age, (5) there appears to be a robust biological component to the difference, (6) the difference shows a Spearman/Jensen Effect, (7) biometric analysis indicates that the gap has a sizable genetic component, (8) the difference is not caused by environmental influences unique to one or the other populations, (9) if environmental influences are causing the gap they act fairly uniformly across the population, (10) the difference is no smaller at the upper SES levels than the lower, (11) family influences can not explain the difference, statistically explaining a decreasing amount with age, (12) Mixed race individual perform intermediate to monoracial individuals and this phenomena has been noted for centuries, (13) the Difference correlates with physical indexes of Caucasian admixture in the Black population, and (14) environmental interventions appear to show little to no lasting effect. Causal biological explanations were then explored and found to be wanting, capable of explaining at most 1/15th of the gap. Causal cultural explanations were discussed and it was noted that these seem to be unable to explain the Jensen Effect, the g-loadedness of the gap, the uniformity of the gap across the IQ spectrum, and the inter-individual between race stability at adulthood.

>>3460585
A person's intelligence can be defined in terms of the speed and efficiency with which he can execute a number of basic cognitive operations. (Vernon, 1981)

>>3137134
>two people hold an opinion contrary to mine
>must be a samefag

I actually don't reduce myself to using racial epithets. I also don't see things this black and white. I think someone like Obama is an outlier (not to mention half white). Overall black intelligence is lower than white intelligence. I'm not even a supremacist. The Japanese are probably a lot smarter than whites on the whole. I consider this to just be a realistic view of the world as diametrically opposed to socially acceptable rhetoric as it is. I'm sorry but people of different races are as different as dogs of different breeds. Deal with it.

>>2858612
Wow, /lit/ sounds pretty fucking stupid.

Your problem is trying to educate a race of borderline retards.

You would have greater success teaching long division to a hamster.

~niggers
_________________________________________________
98% of "Americans" won't stand up for God.
Be one of the 2% that will, copy this in your signature.

LIE-BRILS: If YOU don't stand behind our troops, feel free to stand IN FRONT of them.
Socialism KILLS, AMERICA saves; GOD bless RONALD REAGAN

i'm a hArDcOrE (xXx†hXc†xXx) Christian fiRsT, AnD i b3lEve iN ev0luTion Wh3n mY MuDkIp rEaChEs Lv 18.

>>987192

--Implying black people aren't literal retards--

>your face when 50% of all black people have IQs that would put a white person in a mental home

Explain THIS

you're right OP, niggers are dumb...but this still isn't the correct board to yell it out.

Believing that all races are equal is a respectable ideal to believe in, but it's just that, an ideal, and it's far removed from reality. Similar to believing in god.

Sure it makes everyone feel good, but its ultimately a crock of shit and stands in the way of true progress. Niggers are simply a lower form of man.

>>671942

How is it bullshit again?

>>643345