/lit/ - Literature

>>22142915
>my heckin severino!!!

>>21995871
same lmfao

>>21936397
>uhhhh your mind is fucked and you can't do logic if you can't believe two contradictory models are actually the same thing

>Major inconsistencies in my story? Um, it's called an unreliable narrator, chud.
>What do you mean that's a cop-out> It's an important literary device, I a have peer-reviewed TVtropes article that says so right here.

>Don't think I wouldn't knock you out if you spoke to me like that in person, you pussy.

>>20975047
>just shut up and calculate, okay?

>>20966743
>it's all becoming
>nothing is supposed to make any sense
>yeah, I can still eat properly and wipe my ass, why do you ask?

>>20941955
>socialism is impossible because... because.. because it JUST is chud, okay?!?!
>look chud I got a theorem that says it's impossible. it's literally in the name. it's over.

>>20939431
I humbly accept your admittance of defeat.
>I... I... I didn't know what I was doing when I learned all this bullshit math.
>I was just learning a new language, okay?!?! It's just grammar. Grammar isn't supposed to make sense. It isn't supposed to have applications. It just is, okay chud?
>I never understand ground-breaking developments in math until I go to a conference and personally receive a tutorial from people in the know. There is nothing wrong with this, and this doesn't shake my faith that anything we know in mathematics is anything more than a nerd's cant.
You have to be socially conditioned into accepting this nonsense. Even as a kid, I was thinking about how dumb calculus was. I followed the rules, I aced the test, but always thought to myself "I can't be crazy for thinking that this isn't the Holy Grail I was promised, no?"

>>20824438
>You haven't even read him, how can you disagree with me

>>>20342465 (You)
>>>>/a/

>You are dumb as fuck. Grrm would have to contrive a reason for them to meet up considering they are a continent apart. No wonder you brainlets eat up this dumbshit.

>>18538294
>How can you, a mere mortal, judge the souls of over 1 billion people, and determine they will all go to eternal punishment?

>eww i don't read books written by pedophiles

>>Lope de Vega
>No one cares.

>>18424098
>critical race theory

>I am getting sick and tired of how so many people are reading transgressive literature and acting like it is somehow closer to the sacred. You people need to be executed. It's obvious you don't appreciate life beyond wreaking havoc, so go and die already.
I'm not saying people shouldn't read transgressive literature, but I despise the attitude of treating it as somehow more mature and "aligned with the way things are". Kys, Jew vermin.

>that's because his poetry says nothing, the symbolists are hacks

>For me, it was about a year and a half ago through John Warrington. Let's push it a bit further, do you recall the "four things" which Aristotle thought have a good claim to be thought of as "substance"?

>>18135430
>I strongly suggest you go to your local community college, look up a "debating skills" class, and attend it before ever posting on the internet again. Seriously, I'm sick of what this has become; a pastiche of a pastiche. Someone said or did something you didn't like? That's fine, but why don't you pinpoint exactly what it is that you dislike about what they did, instead of posting a soijak.png and typing in all caps and calling it a day's work?
>What you're doing; It's not an argument. It's not original. It's not funny, nor is it witty, and I'd go so far as to say that it's barely an ad hominem anymore, because the image is used with so many conflicting viewpoints that it's lost all meaning. Now when I see it, I just think "the poster dislikes the archetype he's mocking, but lacks the cognitive capacity to clearly articulate what it is he dislikes, and is therefore a midwit.".
>That's what I think; I think that you're a midwit. It's not even that I feel attacked; in fact, I become all the more disheartened when my opinion aligns with the one you're promulgating, knowing that it's being dragged through the mud by retards such as yourself. You should stop posting, because you aren't funny, you aren't clever, and no one really cares if you disagree with some imaginary ideal. Only a faggot would caption something someone else says and post it alongside a soijak

>Yikerinos

>>17783499
>No dur. Do you actually think most Christians actually read the bible? Most atheists report turning atheists from reading that dumb shit. Religion is socially acceptable insanity. We must do everything to combat this mental virus. Believing in an ideology that helps you cope with our grim reality is a sign of weakness.

>>17694040
Not in the bible.