/lit/ - Literature

>>11776576
Wrong. The natural state of man is te wish for preservation. This is why nostalgia is a thing and you always think the time of your early adolesence was the best time. The more you read the more you understand that the greatest art and ilterature as well as society existed in times of conservation not revolution and progress, which always meant mass death and poverty to most. Also the more you read and the older you get, the more conservative you will become as your wish for reproduction will conflict will revolutionary tendencies, as the later are bad news for your offsprings safety. That's btw proven for women during pregnancy and it's a reason why anti-natalism is so much pushed on western women. Women which don't get kids sta life long revolutionary teenagers. A similar thing happens to men. Having to care for a child also makes you fucking xenophobix beyond believe, as you conider people farer away from your blood to be a higher danger to your children, which is statistically true.

So no matter which aspect you take, once you actually live the life evolution or god wanted you to live, you will get "right wing". Just look at most philosophers on the left, nearly non will have children, and if at all maybe one kid or aren't really there as a parent for the,. Because going through becoming a parents would make them at best National Socialists.