/lit/ - Literature

>>20094646
>Several researchers, such as Vadim Rossman,[3] John Klier,[4] Victor Yasmann,[5][6] Victor Schnirelmann,[7] and Mikhail Tripolsky describe Gumilyov's views as antisemitic.[8] According to these authors, Gumilyov did not extend this ethnological ecumenism to the medieval Jews, whom he regarded as a parasitic, international urban class that had dominated the Khazars and subjected the early East Slavs to the "Khazar Yoke". This last phrase he adapted from the traditional term "Tatar Yoke" for the Mongol domination of medieval Russia, a term Gumilyov rejected for he did not regard the Mongol conquest as a necessarily negative event. In particular, he asserted that the Radhanites had been instrumental in the exploitation of East Slavic people and had exerted undue influence on the sociopolitical and economic landscape of the early Middle Ages. Gumilyov maintained that the Jewish culture was by nature mercantile and existed outside and in opposition to its environment. According to this view, Jews share a specific way of thinking, and this is associated with the moral norms of Judaism. According to Gumilyov, the medieval Jews also did not bear arms themselves, but waged wars by proxies or mercenaries.[9][10][11]

>>17380711
>you are a larper and probably a warlordist too
There's unironically nothing wrong with warlordism. Take the neo-Ghengist pill.