/lit/ - Literature

>A wind had dropped into the silence, and the scent of the onlookers filled his nostrils: the bitter of rotting teeth, the ink of armpits, the honey of unwashed anuses, all shot through with strands of balsam, orange, and jasmine. And for a moment it seemed he stood within a great circle of apes, hunched and unwashed, watching him with dark and dumbfounded eyes.

The word "reckless" has no meaning. There's no such thing as "reck", you can't be -less of something that doesn't exist.

Watching christcucks reach supersonic levels of mental gymnastism to excuse Bible bullshit is one of the most comedically rewarding things out there. Thank you, and bless you, christcuckeroonis

Why is it that antinatalism is the only philosophy which people must argue either on the basis of baseless ad hominems like
>>12242176
or absolute cluelessness on the subject like
>>12242129

Really gets your noggin going, huh?

The true and final cuck is regarding women as objects of romantic attraction at all. Back in the day, when men were great and morals were strong, women were regarded as little more than unpaid maids and trade goods to sell to the highest bidder. Instinctually (since genetic science wasn't invented yet to confirm men's total superiority) men knew that women are sub-human in both intelligence and emotional depth, cannot be trusted with equality, and certainly not to be adored as anything but warm cock sleeves. True affection was reserved for other men, just read Plato's Symposium.
Then, somewhere along the way came The Cursed Anglo, the subversive, sniveling creep, who introduced the destructive idea of giving women time of the day. Civilization was in the slow decay ever since.

It is impossible to think illogically. Humans are slaves of reason.
Hence, it is impossible to be selfless. Humans exist within the confines of their own mind, and cannot reason but for it. What seems to be self-imposed selflessness - sacrifice, charity, empathy - is a projection of reasoned greater good.
Therefore, it is impossible to be evil, because what is reasonable, cannot be evil.

>tfw reading 5 pages of philosophy a day while thinking deeply and critically about every line
>tfw quality over quantity

How many stoics did you bully today, /lit/?

>punch a philosopher
>he realises that knowledge is meaningless in the face of brute force, undergoes existential crisis, and kills himself

>punch determicuck
>steal his money
>fuck his wife
>he sues me
>"Your Honor, this man is convinced that my actions were pre-destined and entirely outside my control, therefore his charges hold no power"
>judge lets me walk free
>punch determicuck again on my way out

>challenge an atheist to prove that he loves his mother
>he can't
>starts crying

>challenge an atheist to prove that suicide is wrong
>he can't
>kill himself

>kill a nihilist
>don't face any charges because his life didn't have any value

>Bellus homo et magnus vis idem, Cotta, videri
>sed qui bellus homo est, Cotta, pusillus homo est.

Why should I care about anything Plato or Aristotle wrote when I'm objectively superior to them?
I know more about mathematics, physics, technology, history, cosmology, culture, I've read more than them by the virtue of having more books at my immediate disposal, and I'm engaged in a much more complex globalized world which forces me to think on entirely different levels of morality. I also condemn slavery and pederasty.

The study of greeks is a meme, they're worthless antique men who cannot compete.

>read How to Win Friends and Influence People
>become OP's lifelong buddy
>he doesn't even know about my masterful deception as we share drinks and watch Game of Thrones together

>punch a stoic
>he doesn't punch back