/lit/ - Literature

Why are trannies so obsessed with them?

"We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously."

Has anyone in literature ever said anything so profound before?

>>15724140
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensory_processing_disorder
It's common for autists. I can't touch certain types of wood without feeling horrible

Anti-Oedipus

Psychoanalysis, no less than the bureaucratic or military apparatus, is a mechanism for the absorption of surplus value, its very form and its finality are marked by this social function.
The whole of psychoanalysis is an immense perversion, a drug, a radical break with reality, starting with the reality of desire; it is a narcissism, a monstrous autism: the characteristic autism and the intrinsic perversion of the machine of capital. At its most autistic, psychoanalysis is no longer measured against any reality, it no longer opens to any outside, but becomes itself the test of reality and the guarantor of its own test: reality as the lack to which the inside and the outside, departure and arrival, are reduced.

I find Spinoza to be harder than Deleuze and Guattari's neo-spinozism and haven't finished the ethics yet

These catatonic bodies have fallen into the river like lead weights, immense transfixed hippopotamuses who will not come back up to the surface. They have entrusted all their forces to primal repression, in order to escape the system of social and psychic repression that fabricates neurotics. But a more naked repression befalls them that declares them identical with the hospital schizo, the great autistic one

>>10457470
>With Guattari we merged to become a non personal individuality. These exist in nature as well and we call them “haecceities”. Language passes between the elements. Guattari and I don’t feel we’re persons exactly. Our individuality is rather that of events.

"Guattari...now neither of us will be a virgin!"

*paints yuppie art on your path*

pure multiplicity, kid

So did they fuck, do we know?

can you tell me about the D's theses ?


what is the goal of D. ?

what does the map is not the territory means ?

what the hell is a rizome ?