/lit/ - Literature

Just keep asking her 'Why?' for everything until she runs out of 'whys' because her materialist worldview is based on assuming that after enough 'whys' there is eventually a 'why' that all too conveniently and short sightedly changes into a series of 'hows' to distract from the more essential 'why' that continues Ad infinitum until you reach the unmoved mover/prime causality/ which is unmistakably immaterial.

Sprinkle in some disillusion of the "self"/"non-self" "I"/"Not I" veil and reminder her that she herself categorically is as much the system itself as she is within the system.

Then remind her that all her 'facts' are necessarily futile as there is an infinite number of 'facts' and that thus all of the 'facts' needed for any argument using said 'facts' would be necessarily be unnacountable. Remind her that an equal number of contrary 'facts' could be discovered and indeed are likely to be discovered and refute anything worthwhile in any of her arguments. Reminder her that 'facts' topple 'facts' and 'reason' topples 'reason' and 'how' topples 'how' and 'why' topples 'why' ad infinitum and the only reconcile is to percieve them from the outside for their futility and identify that with a prime cause that transcends 'why' and 'how' and can still account for itself and the everything that is within itself. This cause would also necessarily hold primacy over every other cause as it cannot precede itself.

Then she asks you 'why?' hit back with the basic bitch general purposes of everything, first principle of being, knowledge as being, fullfillment, realization, overcoming of antithesis, being + nonbeing = process of becoming, etc. It's really up to you at that point, just make sense of it all in a way that's not cheap and not too vague or too specific.

Be sure to call out any 'whys' that are actually 'hows'.

>>19647998

>>19648002