[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17201430 [View]
File: 85 KB, 728x546, introduction-evolutionary-psychology-1-728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17201430

>>17201402
>>17201408
seethe more. science answers everything. Quine knew this.

>> No.6588143 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 67 KB, 728x546, ev psych.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6588143

Why does /lit/ always shit on evolutionary psychology? If one subscribes to the evolution theory and acknowledges that humanity doesn't exist in a magical vacuum, isn't it only reasonable to suggest human behaviour was formed according to patterns determined by evolution?

Also, what are some good books on evolutionary psychology?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]