/lit/ - Literature

>>21646261
You have to understand that Dawkins is a retard outside of his field. He invested himself so fully into the idea of "Science" (i.e. indocrinated himself into scientism) that he's completely filtered by other methods of understanding. He's a literalist (ironically) and that makes him a terrible critic of religious understanding overall. His ideas are simplistic so they were picked up in the mainstream but not deep enough to have any staying power (i.e. one of the main reasons New Atheism was a short lived fad).

>>21418091
Its a popular book so its good for grifting off of.
Its also written by fuckwit Dawkins so its easy to argue against