/lit/ - Literature

>>7034036
I'll have to look into that

>>7034071
>It is a failure on the mass individual level that we have settled into comfortable amateurity, not the fault or machinations of an industry that swoops in after the fact.
I disagree. Any possibility of a mass artistic movement would have to hinge on a similar socio-cultural one, but it would still go alongside the multifaceted pomo stuff. I like a lot of arts today, it's all about diversity. –The worst of it being obviously over commercialized tripe.– But it is all just a continuation.