/lit/ - Literature

>>18788791
But look at those trips, there must be some truth on his words.

>>18747730
>that's what left-wing accelerationism seems to be
no, that's what dumb twitter faggots, dumb surface article readers or people that get their information from memes think. As Mark Fisher (that one guy that was the face of left-wing accelerationism) clearly states "what we are not talking about here is the kind of intensification of exploitation that kneejerk socialist humanism might imagine when the spectre of accelerationism is invoked" (from the left-wing accelerationism text he wrote 'Terminator vs Avatar'), that is to say, the intensification of exploitation by monopolies is not in any way what accelerationists view as the path to any kind of emancipation, atleast not the accelerationists that actually read/think. nor is right-wing accelerationism as dumb as you portray it. Accelerationism, if taken seriously, understands that nothing has ever died from an acceleration or intensification of contradictions.

>>18724339
>I guess it’s early Nick Land, Mark Fisher, Sadie Plant, etc. From the book description
it's mostly Land's thinking. I'd recommend you read the 'Editors Introduction' to Fanged Noumena (written by Robin Mackay & Ray Brassier) to understand what the book's trying to do (as at one point they directly place the work of the CCRU in relation to the things Land was trying to do and explain it). The description, while it's interesting, doesen't really help to understand the point of the book.

>>18667963
By anti-intelectualism do you mean the position that postulates embodiment as the way consciousness works or the notion of dumb niggers that hate anything related to academia? (many such cases here on /lit/)