/lit/ - Literature

It seems like there are a few strands of authoritarian ecologist thought, the differences of which go largely undiscussed, buried under layers of memes, rhetoric, and irony.
For example Ted K is singularly interested in the impact of technics on his own negative conceptions of human freedom. Linkola may share some of these views but he is primarily interested in the long term survival of a diversity of non-human life as an end-goal, and endorses scientific approaches to population management including sterilization, abortion, eugenics, etc. Savitri Devi has some common points with Linkola but does not seem to understand or care very much about technology, instead veering into a reactionary elitism that is more or less a call for a return to caste systems, where non-human life is privileged above the lower castes.
Additionally, Linkola and Devi have the complete opposite positions on domestic cats, which I find poetically indicative of where they are coming from.
I also recall eco-anarchist movements from the 80s-90s being quite a thing in the news although that seems to have completely died out as anarchists become urbanized. Early 20c progressivism a la Madison Grant, Maggie Sanger, and TR as its milquetoast mainstream representative had an ecologist bent, but this seems to have been warped into Green Party liberalism these days.
So what is going on with this? Is there anything of substance behind the memes or is ecology better left to apolitical actors?

What is some good anprim/ecofash literature?

Advice about ecofascist/Malthusian literature?