/lit/ - Literature

>>5127802
Equality is related to the direct interests of individuals who are bent on escaping certain inequalities not in their favor, and setting up new inequalities that will be in their favor

>>4984954
Because he's an Evola who based his views on scientific enquiry instead of hacky mysticism.

/lit/ is very hypocrite. It supports socialism because it can't compete on the economical market with it's shitty English degrees, but when it comes to the sexual market, where they are competitive and have easy access to cute hipsters girls, they are the most avid defenders of the laissez-faire status quo.

It goes to show that people only fight for equality when it's advantageous for them. Pic related.

So let me understand this. /lit/ supports communism because it wants equality for economically disadvantaged people, but it mocks people who fight for sexual equality as "losers" and "weirdos".

Way to show your hypocrisy. You only want equality when it is advantageous for you, as you don't have the means to compete in the economic market you want forced equality. In the sexual market, where you are competitive, you defend a laissez-faire that would shock even Mises, even though thousands of young men like this one are left destitute.