/lit/ - Literature

>>19312548
>techniques such as stream of consciousness starts revealing at this level.
You just know it is made by some teenager hyping up reading in his head before he even began.
As for your answer, it is pretty much all dishonest. It is based entirely on perceived notions of writers on this board rather than on the writer's work. You can tell the creator only cared for a few writers who he wanted to place way down and then feel good about liking those writers.

>>18668847

>>18593112
Hey, you are that guy from one week ago! Holy fuck, you are still seething lmao! McCarthy fucked your mama, innit?
>easy accessible prose for easily impressed american retards.
Even if your ESL ass believes that shit, this comparison makes no sense here because Nabokov is an even more casual and pleb friendly prose writer.

>>18557691
Also
>cream for a hymen tear
Way to prove you are virgin retard.

>>18551022
>The things Melville is trying to express, are truly as complicated as the prose he employs; no word is wasted, the complexity serves a higher end of expressing something that only complex prose can express. BM doesn’t have that. If you boil each paragraph of that “book” down to its bare elements it would read: “”they went through the desert. The judge did something nasty. They got drunk.”
I am sure you expected to be seen as smart lmao. Yeah bro, all that cetology shit is very useful and "serve purpose" but "violence bad" and Mccarthy needs to learn from you how to symbolism. /lit/ never misses the chance to embarrass themselves.

>>12686999
this is amazing