/lit/ - Literature

>>22728568
S-stop it!

>>22124912
Yes they are lol. The key to it is that they constantly live in their heads and even more so in their feelings. Men don't take feelings too seriously and try to get shit done, women focus more on how things make them feel, and this makes the most sensitive and perceptive women extremely capable writers on the topics of emotion, feeling, psychological conflict and behaviour.
>>22124914
>Women on the other hand find fulfillment in a narrative that really is just about those two particular individuals and nothing else. The particular, contingent events of their lives serve as their own justification.
If you can't find the universal within the particular you're kinda ngmi desu. I don't disagree with a lot of what you say, but if you've actually read some female-written romances, the particular story does tell you a lot about the universals of love, at least from the female perspective. If you pay attention, you see it.
>>22125126
This is how it looks to you from a some sort of redpiller perspective. From their perspective, they're just trying to know that you're there for them. "Shit testing" is really more like wanting to know that your man won't hate you even if you're the dumbest, saddest, most malicious and unpleasant creature on earth. And women do find a lot of consolation and comfort in knowing that their men will love them no matter what, no matter how ugly it gets, or how ugly they get. And they do this unconsciously because their emotions influence their minds and behaviours more closely. I think the nagging, brutalising and emasculating traits of women actually stem from a quite different source, specifically neurosis, fear, anxiety, lack of emotional control, discomfort, foreboding - also lack of emotional stimulation.
>>22125665
>Bottomline, if you want women to swoon over you, disregard everything your mother told you about how to treat a lady.
Sure, maybe. My mother just wanted a SonBot to do chores and look innocent, so this is certainly true in my case. Probably not in all cases.
On the other stuff, you're wrong. I am looking at women's fantasies, aimed at women - I am not listening to what they tell society. This is how I know that they do want emotional strife. They do want it. But they don't at all want it like the redpillers want to give it - that is deeply traumatic, scarring and unpleasant for them. They want suffering only as a necessary part of a ping-pong dynamic, where you argue and then reconcile immediately after, continuously, forever. This builds trust and love that a woman cannot easily obtain from a normal and peaceful relationship without strife. She wants to know that you'll love her even if the sky is falling - being loved in peace is not at all enough for her, and if she feels dissatisfied, she will disrupt this peace just to confirm that you *do* love her even in strife, after all.