/lit/ - Literature

wait... trannies actually post here? i thought it was a meme.

>>17347300
i hate this fucking board

>>12994614
I haven't read Murray's book, but I have read Goulds rebuttal to some of the ideas Murray claims in his book. So what do you say about the spurious methods of IQ testing utilized by researchers, or is this still a contentious issue whether those of varying cultural backgrounds may have problems with western-centric IQ testing methods i.e. Stanford-Binet.

I'm going to restate what Gould criticizes, but is the reification of IQ justified? May the factors of intelligence be too great to properly quantify in a meaningful way.

These are a few of the things some of you pro-Murray-fags should address. Also, I'm not an anti-IQ shill, I'm genuinely ignorant as to its viability in describing populations. I don't have any problems with various populations having lower average IQs if it has data to meaningfully back it up.