/lit/ - Literature

>>23380777
>the concept behind the whole movement is not conservative
There is nothing you have said to convince me of this.

>in fact, I think it will be hated by the left AND the right in all of their forms because it aims to establish its meaning past the boundaries each of the pre-existing political ideologies have set in regards to specific aspects of culture and the individual's experience of his cultural heritage and his own personal history embedded in it.
This is a terribly run on sentence. But it is empty of most meaning. Given what you have said in your OP it is entirely supported by modern conservatives and will be rejected by the Left as pure reactionary thinking, but what is worse is that it is boring reactionary thinking. It does not seek to create or build anew, but dredge up from the past that which has been forgotten. This is not a ignoble goal in itself, but it is not the keystone of a movement that transcends the Western Liberal Democratic system of Left vs Right.

>(in other words, the politico-cultural systems are too philosophically sparse to account for the totality of culture and its sub-divisions)
Breadth of an ocean, depth of a puddle springs to mind here.

>to be clear - this is not a fascist movement, nor a communist or a centrist one regardless of what works we read
Saying it is not X does not make it so anymore than saying it is Y makes it so.

>and we ARE going to read works which will not be approved of by people who are too attached to current political divisions (on any "side")
This is conservative thinking. Nobody cares if you read books. You are not provoking anything if you read books from the other side. Be it Mein Kampf or the Hungry Hungry Handbook.

>and, of course, you are always welcome along for this new journey we are embarking on
Sadly the journey has been made many times by many people, there does not appear to be any new stops.

That said, i wish you luck.

>>23174361
>Remaining unemotive as a caste of rat-like parasites destroy your future is the real übermensch>
The Nazis' better embodied many of the princple and ethos of much of Nietzsche's work. More so than anybody before or since. The mental-block and complete lack of discourse around the entire regime supports this.

All of modernity, from the self proclaimed stoic teck worker to the man on on the street, are all Üntermensch and Last Men.

>>23118277
>Communism
>Everybody should be equal but we wre not because of structural blah blah

>Liberalism
>We are all equal but we are won't be due to personal blah blah

They rely on the same fundemental premise and result in the same thing. Homogenous peoples without culture, heritage and ethnicity. Because one has men with flappy mantits and marvel movies does not make it something else, the goal is the same, make everybody equal. There is no black, no white, no woman nor man. There is simply an economic unit who has must consume (Liberalism) or produced (Commumism).

If you truly think peoples are not equals you would immediately be a Fascist, or some sort of ethno-nationalis. But people do not, they begin from the false premise that people are more or less interchangable.

Is there any demand for a fairly wordly blue-collar lad who's interested in literature but has no education past the age of 15? A younger and poorer Scottish version of AvE. I'm 30, bought a small house and am expecting my first child. Most literature youtubers are not like this.

I've always had a few books on the go. It did not matter if i was pulling stag duty in the British army at midnight or running pipe in the Texas heat, durinng downtime i would sit and read and write. I've a few funny stories too.

Carl Schmitt
Jonathan Bowden
Thomas Carlyle

>gas the kikes
>gas the blacks
>gas the browns
>gas the commies
>gas the liberals
>gas the conservitives

>>23018632
No. In its original form is probably served a great function in forcing forethought on wildly reckless men who would damage themselves and would condemn a polis to a swift doom if the wrong decision was made in statesmanship or diplomacy. Now it is a literal cope and means of futher reducing man's natural vitality and need for action by preaching it to the every man, who is not a wildly reckless man but a fat, overeducated slob of materialism who needs every inducement to action not more barriers ti prevent it.

>>23009944
Fucking whatever you intellectual mong-fuck.

OP just start in any dirt you find and if your interest baturally increases in scale, take courses.

Homesteading and small scale commercial farming on a hald dozen acres is the best. All the women have fat chests. Even youtubers who larp the lifestyle do.

>>23003224
This makes me happy.

>>22994120
>Fascism was a unity of contradictions
What are these manifold contradictions? Please be as specific as possible.

> There were no contradictions within fascism, for fascism itself was the contradiction.
In what way did this take place and what was the result to the nation caused by it?

>>22985554
>>22985829
>>22985616

>mfw a book came out prior to WW2 and the Holocaust called Germany Must Perish
>mfw jews are being erased faster than ever and Israel wont survive the next 2-3 generations as it becomes overpopulated witg dumb, primitive Haredi
>mfw all efforts in the West are to stop ethic and racial conciousness waking up

>>22984926
It is simply talking about the Judeo-Christian-Islamic view of sex being warped and regarded as disgusting and utterly without any deeper spiritual meaning.

The author wants to change that view.

>>22979830
I had a full childhood growing up anon, still have a full and happy family. Im expecting my first child in May. Life is amazing, it saddens me your mind goes to the worst places when debating.

>>22970054
>But this won't bring them eternal life.
Why would one wish for eternal life? If i am to rest forever and fade to nothingness, i do so happy that i raised a good family and left my land better than i found it.

>>22966550
No, anon. They have not. Theology has had to be dragged in to every new development and discovery. Don't get me wrong, modernity is a shitshow. Further, the Nazi's has the right idea in removing the anti-life Semetic influences from Christianity in order to create a nativist ethnic creed that can support and grow a people.

As it stands now Christianity has failed, on evert metric to continuously improve people's life. It commands one to neglect the material world for the spiritual, while modernity demands you neglect the spiritual for the material. One needs to reconcile this. Postive Christianity was a chance at this.
>inb4 muh pagan, i despise those too

Man is a rising beast.

It is very encouraging to see such vigorous support and sharing of this topic, it is only a matter of time before this breaks through in to mainstream politics.

>>22935594
How is he a genius?

Can you, a supposed genius, explain to me, an average working man, why his manifesto is not a psyop to neutralize far-right, back to the land romanticism. Which is a phenomenon that happens with regularity every century.

>>22931487
>>22931575
Any book recommendations? May as well raise my flag as a National-Socialist, or similar position.

>>22927221
Correct.

>>22901840
>Go raibh maith agat, mo chara. Tiocfaidh ár lá! I picked it up for the third positionist environmentalism, stayed for the healthy mind/body recommendations

I had it squarely for the blood and soil ideology and new means of leadership. The agrarian roots were a welcome addition. It encouraged me to place more effort in to homesteading.

I love Elric, its an easy read that is enjoyable. Strongly recommend.

>>22854235
You can not rise above biology. Your post is an empty poetic statement. The retard can not rise above its deficiency, the short man can not grow taller, the ugly and deformed can not escape their wretched image. All simply must learn to work within the confines of what their body and abilities allow. One must embrace the natural biological impulses and motivations that allow animals to be healthty.

Those rare few who have minds made to wonder and build are the exception, not the rule.

Your sentence is no different in meaning or worldview than Taylor Swift telling a fat, ugly untalented girl to never give up following her dream of stardom.

>>22841184
One can be a Socialist and Right-Wing, one simply can not be Marxist. Socialism is not muh gubmint, class warfare and equality.

The Military is operated on a
Non-Marxist socialist setup, nobody would ever think of having a libertarian organisation responsable for war, even in a private enterprise it is organized the same.

Non-Marxist Social = forge a unified and unique whole and administer the common weal, maintaining heirarchy and distinctions.

Marxist Socialism = Remove all heirarchy and divisions, forge a single homogenous unity and administer all resources.

The Left/Right distinction is entirely useless now and only really exists in Liberalism. And for a handful of meta-values like quantity vs quality.

>>22841403
There needs to be a revolution on the modern 'Right' to embrace the energy and values of the far/alt/extreme right and push out the backwards and reactionary element.

Its just jews, they are able to manipulate power structures with money. Stop trying to overthink it, it is literally just jews, some of whom want to fuck non-jewish children.