/lit/ - Literature

i just want to feel pleasure and be happy
i dont need any books for this feel

>he just now figured this out

>>22554432
Lol.
>Confirmed forgery
>No Governor of Jerusalem or Procurator of Judea is known to have been called Lentulus, and a Roman governor would not have addressed the Senate in the way represented.
>The Roman writer cited the expressions "prophet of truth", "sons of men" or "Jesus Christ". The former two are Hebrew idioms, and the third is taken from the New Testament. The letter, therefore, gives a description of Jesus such as Christian piety conceived of him.

>this board
>this thread

>>21554334
These are the ESLs claiming to know English better than us.

>>21544132
>This culture has rejected you
It seems /lit/ is no better than /v/, /mu/ and /a/ when it comes to assuming anybody that disagrees with you is necessarily on a 'side' and that that side is necessarily not their 'side'. Bunch of children forming their personalities around books and thinking they're any better than the children forming their personalities around video games, music, and cartoons.

>>21499906
>only one person in the world writes in anglish

>>21489409
you know what else didn't emerge until trannies did? trans"phobia". aah fuck... looks like we were being feminine this whole time by hating trannies

Foot "fetishes" are so remarkably easy to explain, I'm genuinely confused as to why there's so much retarded rationalization in this thread. It's simple. The feet of the women outside your own family are usually covered in layers of clothing like shoes and socks, and so you begin to associate a woman's bare feet with the comfort of familiarity. It's a sign you've become close enough to a woman that she's willing to show you her feet, even though they are typically regarded as being repulsive or foul-smelling. All of this takes on an aspect of sensuality when they're the feet of a woman you love or are sexually interested in.

>>21447603
3 months ago everyone was bandwagoning on Gnosticism (again)
2 months ago everyone was bandwagoning on Catholicism (again)
Last month /lit/ was bandwagoning on Puritanism
This month /lit/ is bandwagoning on Calvinism

...I wonder how could be behind this. you guys are hopelessly retard contrarian who throw away all your (false) values the moment they come widely accepted or encouraged, even if it's just on an imageboard. not one of you actually believes in any of this stuff, and anyone who stays strong in their belief of anything is called a larper.

>>21429170
>goes to /lit/
>knows most if not all literature is inherently political
>gets angry because anons discuss the politics the books they read bring up
idk what you expected

>>21413503
>In a right wing society they're right wing. In a left wing society they're left wing. In christian communities they're anti abortion.
this is totally NOT true for men.

>>21344078
lmfao you actually did it you absolute retard.