/lit/ - Literature

>>23074071
>Yes, characterize anything you don't like as (disagreeable political group to the people you're speaking with)
Child sexual abuse theory is a discredited pseudoscience which was invented by Jewish Feminists in the 1970s who took samples of victims of incestuous rape and extrapolated their outcomes to consensual participants in adult-child sexual relationships. There is not a single study which shows that consensual adult-child sex is correlated with negative outcomes, because that doesn't happen.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_sexual_abuse#In_society
>"By the early 21st century, the issue of child sexual abuse has become a legitimate focus of professional attention, while increasingly separated from second wave feminism ... As child sexual abuse becomes absorbed into the larger field of interpersonal trauma studies, child sexual abuse studies and intervention strategies have become degendered and largely unaware of their political origins in modern feminism and other vibrant political movements of the 1970s. One may hope that unlike in the past, this rediscovery of child sexual abuse that began in the 70s will not again be followed by collective amnesia. The institutionalization of child maltreatment interventions in federally funded centers, national and international societies, and a host of research studies (in which the United States continues to lead the world) offers grounds for cautious optimism. Nevertheless, as Judith Herman argues cogently, 'The systematic study of psychological trauma ... depends on the support of a political movement.'"

Nobody believed in the retarded myth that sex harms children until Jewish Feminists started pushing it in the 1970s, and that myth has since been used to attack and destroy the foundations of Aryan civilization, by making taboo age-gap relationships, delaying the onset at first marriage, eliminating youth pregnancy, and by dividing white people with mass hysteria. A society can not flourish if youth-marriage and man/boy love are criminalized.
>Your arguments are shit
Refute them, then?