/lit/ - Literature

>>11736898
M Y D I A R Y D E S U *dabs*

>>11350599

>lolnope which is why I don't bully philosophers for using poetic language or the size of the books
You reading comprehension must be below average: nobody has been bullying any philosopher for being poetic in here nor for the size of the books - only you have no actual books of the presocratics, just fragments, and obscure fragments. It is legit to question their relevance in the history of the development of scientific ideas since there is little material on them and, as the anon who blew your ass open told you multiple times, most of that material is mediated by Plato and Aristotle.
You have sistematically avoided answering each and every person who called you out for not knowing Plato, Aristotle and history of philosophy in general, since you show consistent ignorance of the following points:
-Who the main character of the Platonic dialogues is
-Where do the presocratic fragments come from
-Whether early science was reading the presocratics (the answer is no btw)
-General history of the Academy (when do they become skeptics, when Platonism is re-discovered, etc.)
-Role and relevance of Epicureanism and atomism in general throughout the history of philosophy
-Differences between ancient and modern atomism

Stop trying to refute a point nobody is arguing for and go read a fucking book you have been imposing your intellectual diarrhea on this thread for almost two days now goddammit

>>11350421

If you have something to say to me, say it in my face in 1st person, not to that guy over there using 3rd, got it? Otherwise I'll destroy your smartypants ass.