/lit/ - Literature

>>12871292
That post is from the genealogy idiot.
>>12871298
is this bait?
>"Who is really evil according to the meaning of the morality of resentment?" In all sternness let it be answered thus:—just the good man of the other morality, just the aristocrat, the powerful one, the one who rules, but who is distorted by the venomous eye of resentfulness, into a new colour, a new signification, a new appearance.

>You can see now what the remedial instinct of life has at least tried to effect, according to my conception, through the ascetic priest, and the[Pg 166] purpose for which he had to employ a temporary tyranny of such paradoxical and anomalous ideas as "guilt," "sin," "sinfulness," "corruption," "damnation." What was done was to make the sick harmless up to a certain point, to destroy the incurable by means of themselves, to turn the milder cases severely on to themselves, to give their resentment a backward direction

and - the first line of aphorism 10 of the genealogy:
>The revolt of the slaves in morals begins in the very principle of resentment becoming creative and giving birth to values—a resentment experienced by creatures who, deprived as they are of the proper outlet of action, are forced to find their compensation in an imaginary revenge.

>>12645800
BTFO

>>12262562
Because the posters here force poetry, for any kid to write it they would need to go out of their way to, and since they have probably read little poetry and don't rely on their reason, they make original emotive works. This rawness compared to a /lit/-izen trying to copy Joyce while actively repressing his emotions never stood a chance.

Wrong.