/lit/ - Literature

>>17601344
>entitlements that mysteriously come at the cost of everyone else
>independent of a nonsensical, right wing meme
I don't have "some other way to put it" that's the way it is when people - regardless of political affiliation - call a social program or government action a "right." They're calling it a right when enacting it costs portions of our rights.
>trying to prove me wrong by showing how capitalist democracies limit freedom
Literally every multiperson system, including the capitalist companies and democratic governments function off of the citizens partially sacrificing their rights for the sake of the sovereign (CEO/board of directors or federal government). capitalist companies are definitely overstepping their boundaries as they're violating the "private" part of "private" company by acting as the wrongthink police for the government.
There's nothing on paper to say a socialist system can't establish a proper balance between rights being given by citizens and protections/privileges being offered to them, but like >>17595338 said,
>80, 90 failures? That's too many failures

>>17496833
I don't have "some other way to describe the formation of civilizations from a state of lacking them. That's the way it is."