/lit/ - Literature

>>6992836
Youre the only one replying because youre the only one dumb enough not to see the truth of the matter. Seriously, grow the fuck up.

Youre defending dead men who you obviously know nothing about if you cant see them for what they are; and you're not refuting any of my points, just stubbornly refusing to accept youre wrong.

>The background on historical events isn't a factor in studying them

Its a factor, sure; but nothing more. It doesnt mean shit in terms of right and wrong. A right being based in truth and natural law, and the actions based in it do no result in harm to other sentient beings. A wrong would be just the opposite, not based in truth or natural law and results in harm to other sentient beings.

I know it hurts to be proved wrong but hey it happens, and its not a bad thing.