/lit/ - Literature

>>15273960
Your child will not be like you. I speak from experience. There are kids totally different in temperament and character than their parent. It is naive for you to assume you could guarantee that. And even when, there is the inherit risk of the world. Just look at some trafficaccidents statistics. This is a world where your kid could loose limbs, eyesight, whole face etc

>>15273987
You are retarded, not my fault when you simplify my views.
>>15273969
Nope they are not. Just adhominems, misrepresentation and faulty arguments.
>>15274012
Finally a honest person. But surely you must see that preventing suffering is the least arbitrary because most living things abide by it.
Sure it is based on subjective feelings but it is the most sensical assumption to make
>>15274016
Very brutal indeed.
Idk if you believe in free will but the fact that suffering exists to that extend makes it kind of predictable that it will happen to future generations too. What a cruel game where everyone looses in the end.
>>15274017
idc
>>15274074
You are assuming that antinatalism=nihilism. When you care about preventing suffering and that is your meaning you are not nihilist.
You are just making assumption and do not attack the ethical argument.
If pain is so great then why is it even there? It is there to avoid the thing that is painful, so your biological human form can survive you fucking dingus. Stick the maria statue up your butt
>>15274093
This statement literally supports the antinatalist position.
Maybe you are an elitist psychopaths who spits on the homeless because
>haha they not me they got beaten by their dad loltzz