[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17623314 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1581968356486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17623314

>>17617691
But there is a physicalist explanation for what 'qualia' actually are (trope theory). The fact that experience is our conduit to everything doesn't preclude experience being phsyical itself. What would it even mean for something to be 'non-physical'? I can point to an fMRI of specific brain activity of a subject experiencing stimuli, can you point to a 'gap' between experience and the brain?

The 'hard problem' only exists because you are mysticizing 'qualia'. It is entirely possible that what we call 'qualia' are a subset of quanta, and in fact there is no specific alternative hypothesis.

>> No.15182056 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1581968356486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15182056

>>15181781
Reasoning is an impulse anon. You only reason about something because you first -feel- some way about it.

>> No.14855899 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1581968356486.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14855899

>>14855824
>qualia

>> No.14742465 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 7927979B-A10C-415B-9E0B-9A0778C96E21.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14742465

>go to college
>humanities department has board up about how philosophy isn’t a meme degree and how companies totally want someone who can explain German Idealism to their shareholders
Lol

>> No.14733994 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, C4B1437B-3FA5-40F4-9AB5-2C7491854593.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14733994

>>14733990
>but anon he referenced the Hegelian dialectic

>> No.14681439 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1447180785409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14681439

>>14681401
No assessment regarding the truth of the claims proposed was made. They're called out as "midwit" and "retarded" because they read as a play on words or a logic puzzle rather than a strictly philosophical statement, without actual implications beyond being something taken for granted in most situations where the term "thing" ans "nothing" is used.

Though there is a Wittgensteinian argument to be had that if these were to be put into context in a broader philosophical system or framework they'd have merit, which I agree with.

>> No.14668873 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1447180785409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14668873

19
Student
OCD

>> No.14663799 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1447180785409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14663799

>>14663008
>>14663051
>>14663060
>>14663061
>>14663074
>>14663137
>>14663306
>>14663316
>>14663328
>>14663331
>>14663341
>>14663344
>>14663351
>>14663424
>>14663480
>>14663623
>>14663736
>>14663739
>>14663745
im gonna be dragon my balls across your face

>> No.14606269 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1447180785409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14606269

>>14606210
>Google standard dose for mushrooms.
ah gotchya i thought maybe you had your personal opinion on *standard*

>a willingness to avoid issues is generally symptomatic of a personality which feels oppressed by external circumstance
ah fuck you're right, you're so right that you reminded me that i had nearly the exact same thought; that my behavior wasn't the result of pure rationalism but a coping mechanism. what's the word for this feeling?, oof, yikes, mood, etc

>> No.14604988 [View]
File: 35 KB, 679x679, 1447180785409.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14604988

>>14604973
He's just angry that you insulted his meme degree.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]