/lit/ - Literature

This one is pretty interesting. Despite the Italian and Anglo last names the authors are actually Hare Krishnas, they basically look at a whole lot of 'out of place objects' like Anatomically modern human bones which have been discovered in geological formations that are tens or hundreds of thousands of years older than the consensus of when Anatomically Modern Humans walked the earth.
From what I understand the vast majority of the examples they provide are reaching, even stuff like the bones were planted because in the days before modern archeology the unskilled laborers working for gentleman explorers/archeologists would get rewards if they found something.
Still, I think it's not controversial to suggest that the dawn of man is only a estimate.
It's a terrifying thought though to think that mankind has been through the rise of civilization and then been smashed to ashes many times.

>>20001016

>>19974388
>>19974438
It’s likely that humans went back and forth, weighing the pros and cons

What’s not to get about prehistoric romanticism?
https://youtu.be/hY8xx1RLGps

>>19310481
It was a very large theory to begin with and enough of it has been proven to be that it is no longer a theory. Only certain parts need ironing out, but so much has been proven that it cannot be walked back.

>>19238908

>>19223818
>lemme tell yu about humans

>>18936146
Wtf? Science. Geologists date the sites the evolutionary orthodox can’t wrap their heads around it and cover it up. It’s weird scientism that’s preventing real science