/lit/ - Literature

>>15723530
>Ambient Dungeon Synth
>Summoning
>Caladan brood
>Bach fugue
>Chrono trigger soundtrack
>Dk 2 soundtrack

>>15535911
I don't hang out with people who even care about this stuff. For now. I can tell them about Evola and they don't care, they find him funny or slightly interesting. If people ask what I'm interested in I usually say I'm a "medievalist" "neo-classical mystic" "European comparative mythologist" and plus I usually hide the books with Aryan in the titles.
Girls only glance at the mess of books and I haven't had any long term girlfriends. People who would possibly get mad at me because of these books I would have on meeting them immediately understood that we wouldn't match. There's outward signs. I hang around with blue collar dudes who find this stuff interesting and don't get mad and usually have no knowledge of any of the books.like >>15535953 said.
They're basically edgy nihilist so I just can't enforce a hard-line worldview on them but I can critique and mock all day with them.

The blue collar (white) workers usually are pretty honest and down-to-earth.
Really though, I only have close friends in my room and I know that they don't care. Most of them are apolitical good guys.

>>14967416
As great as ending nog proliferation would be, this would also be sad as chinks are like yellow-goo that have zero respect for any ecology they inhabit (not that ivory poaching, bushmeat loving nogs particularly do, but chinks take the rape of nature to a whole new level).

>>13964277
The bookworms are prejudiced against the philochads; they see us as shitting up their board even though most of us read too and tend to elevate the level of discourse in whatever thread we join.

So the jannie goes "I bet his philosophy thread isn't about a specific philosophical work... Heheh, gottem!" Yes, well done you anti-intellectual automaton.

>>12447774
So join the synthetic set.

There is no literal 'metaphysical' category of reality... They're just talking about conceptualizing/abstraction. All meaning relates to observations of our reality. Any analytic or normative statement relies upon collateral knowledge for meaning, and so the synthetic/descriptive is always implicit.

Philosophy is replete with abstract categories fallaciously presented as concrete dichotomies. It's mental gymnastics for the leap towards transcendentalism.