[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.16379101 [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1582432123822.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16379101

Spoiler alert:
I was the shadow of the waxwing slain
By the false azure in the windowpane

>> No.15318982 [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1588122325057.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15318982

>>15316104
>not Ignatius

>> No.15223720 [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1578981929792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15223720

>>15223607
Fugg, there goes my /lit/ cred.

>> No.14979922 [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1578981929792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14979922

>>14979643
>I'm not a native English speaker, but what I was really trying to ask was why are these kinds of threads so prevalent?
Okay, i'll make it explicit. People use these generic additions like 'books for this feel' 'what does /lit/ think of x' 'is x /lit/ approved' etc. to talk about non-literature subjects while trying to avoid getting their thread deleted by Jannie. Many people here don't read but seem to think the discussions on /lit/ will be better than whatever board the topic is appropriate to, so they just post it here under the guise of the aforementioned BS. People do the same thing on /sci/ but tag in 'scientifically speaking' at the end of their thread.

>> No.14772461 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1582432123822.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14772461

>there are an infinite number of possible worlds and i'm stuck with you guys as worldmates

>> No.14772454 [View]
File: 81 KB, 250x250, 1578981929792.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14772454

libgen

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]