/lit/ - Literature

Control is all about not having any control.
Control is all about being flexible.
Control is about not having any control, but taking it where you can get it.
Control is the conditioning of the future by the error between the past and the present.
The error between who you are, and who you would like to be.
The error between who you are, and the aspects of people you like.
Control isn't practically total.
Control isn't about mastering someone else's life for yourself.
Control is about having a novel general method to master your own life for yourself.
Control always locally breaks down and you must accept that.
Control works through instruments.
Control, ideal, works through instruments, practical.
Control is practically non-linear, and time-invariant, and so always necessarily lacks a comprehensive, governing theory.
Control is a series of sensors and actuators.
Eyes can sense, bodies can actuate.
Meters can sense, motors can actuate.
Control is all about subtraction.
Control is all about subtracting a desire from sensed reality.
The desire-reality difference can then be actuated.
I am not in control, and that makes me uncomfortable.
I am not in control, because I can't vision my desires.
I cannot actuate without an error, and cannot meaningfully subtract without a desire.
In order to be in control you must first close your eyes.
In order to be in control you must first imagine a desired reality.
The reality need not be feasible.
Imagine a desired reality, subtract and then actuate.
If you can't even imagine a desired reality, then you are not in control.
Control is all about vision, and reality.
Control is all about desire, and difference.
Control is all about not having any control.

Control is all about not having any control.
Control is all about being flexible.
Control is about not having any control, but taking it where you can get it.
Control is the conditioning of the future by the error between the past and the present.
The error between who you are, and who you would like to be.
The error between who you are, and the aspects of people you like.
Control isn't practically total.
Control isn't about mastering someone else's life for yourself, control is about having a novel general method to master your own life for yourself.
Control always locally breaks down and you must accept that.
Control works through instruments.
Control works through instruments, and so.
Control is practically non-linear, and time-invariant, and so it always necessarily lacks a comprehensive, governing theory.
Control is a series of sensors and actuators. Eyes can sense, bodies can actuate.
Meters can sense, motors can actuate.
Control is all about subtraction.
Control is all about subtracting a desire from sensed reality.
The desire-reality difference can then be actuated.
I am not in control, and that makes me uncomfortable.
I am not in control, because I can't vision my desires.
I cannot actuate without an error, and cannot meaningfully subtract without a desire.
In order to be in control you must first close your eyes.
In order to control you must first imagine a desired reality.
The reality need not be feasible.
Imagine a desired reality, subtract and then actuate.
If you can't even imagine a desired reality, then you are not in control.
Control is all about not having any control.