/lit/ - Literature

>>13182915

>>13076721
The Qur'an prescribes death for certain things. The reason Muhammed used stoning is that is how Arabs put people to death. Since the Shariah is supposed to be a restoration of the Mosaic Law which, surprise, surprise, prescribes stoning for adultery from what we know, maybe you need to take a step back for a moment and consider that a violating a marriage covenant is considered a very serious betrayal, not just fornication. If stealing from someone (according to a Hadith, the value must be over a shield) is grounds for getting your hand cut off, then cheating on your spouse can't possibly be considered less, as it is much worse.

The issue here is you assume the Qur'an was revealed and applied in a vacuum. It was not. It was revealed and applied in a specific culture that was still imitating much that had been inherited from Abraham, the Qur'an builds on or corrects much of this. Islam is not a do-it-yourself religion, despite not having a clergy, Islam is extremely community focused, the very fact that a penal code is part of it suggests that.

Stoning, not beheqding, was how people were put to death among them. Why the death penalty is used for adultery is already stated here

>>13076160

Verse 5:32 gives the two penalties which incur death, verse 5:33 gives the various penalties for one of those charges

In fact you have no better theory for how this works, as you obviously don't kill and then exile someone. What I explained I did not fabricate, it is Islamic scholarship. Ghimidi in fact attests to this, despite interpreting the Qur'an as applying specifically to historical circumstances in many places, as you do.

>>13019716
Too boomer 4 me


https://youtube.com/watch?v=Y4dr8mp3yKU

>>12964728
The absolute state of benison fags lmaoo

>>12949321
Shia started the permitting of suicide bombing and address homosexual with sex changes

>>12925973
>No they don't.
Yes they do, if you don't you are not a Christian...or a Muslim. Don't lie

>>12920293
Allah

>>12896223
Islam is the chemo for liberalism

>>12891580
The aesthetic is lower than the ethical, the religious above the ethical. Kierkgaard's conception of God is totally at odds with Islam, which holds we are no the children of God (and thus should not consider Him a father), we are not made in the image of God, that God is totally without any emotion whatsoever. However Kietkgaard's three stages of aesthetic-ethical-religious are totally in line with Islam, which always places submission to God befpre morals and both before aesthetics