/lit/ - Literature

>>15217865
I am aware of the fact that males have a larger IQ variance than women, but this does not disprove anything I said. /lit/‘s view on women is not “they have slightly less variance in their IQ distribution”, but “women are vapid whores who do not appreciate literature”. Almost literature students and most readers are women? They do it only to social signal! A woman BTFO a /litizen/? She just looked it all up on google!

>>11162322
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/tippling/2017/02/25/iq-using-race-divisively/
It’s a pretty biased source, but I’ve heard it repeatedly in schoolteacher circles.