/lit/ - Literature

>>8756733
OP listen to: >>8756751

You won't get laid if you go full autistic on analytic or continelal philosophy.
Same applies to literature.

>BANAL PLATITUDES
This is what'll get you laid.

If a girl asks you about huh, lets say jane austen and you go full autistic on "game theory" and how it applies to her novels1 or if a girl inquires you about a generic poet and you rant or exhorts him pointing out either the flaws or good traits, THEN YOU WON'T GET LAID.
Sure it may work sometimes, but the generic girl won't want an analysis past: "I liked it, specially the <insert most famous work or poem>". Or she will see you as "an obnoxius basement dweller autist" or something like that.

Also drop this shit 3/10 evaluation. What matters most is hygiene and how you behave.
If you look already bad and don't treat your health and hygiene properly, you won't get anything.


1 This can be generalized to: If a girl asks you about <insert book> and you go full autistic on <insert theme>.

>>8723309
>posting an actual molyneux meme to defend the intellectual legitimacy of a PUA book

wew fucking lad

>>7046265
I've got dank memes too m8.

There isn't some rule book that says "local business = good". Amazon operates at a loss every single year in order to provide staggering innovations to technology, warehousing, and shipping that every other company is afraid to try. It is now considered "normal" to have a package arrive in two days (sometimes less!). You could hardly find a single thing that isn't cheaper to buy on Amazon, or at least the same price as it would be in a brick & mortar shop. Anything Amazon touches creates a frenzy of competition: the Kindle, Fire, Echo, AWS, Instant Video, even the crazy shit like drone delivery.

Not only is Amazon a net positive to consumers, I would argue they don't have a single negative for consumers.

I see you've been BTFO by 3 other people while I was typing this post, so hopefully that gets you to reconsider your "MUH SMALL BUSINESS" posture.

I am fucking platinum mad that they put Capital in the 21st Century on that list, as if a single one of these fucks read or is capable of understanding it.

Never in my life will I believe that a group of dipshits read a 700 page book on economics.

Is this the part where you tell us you've copy-pasted some teenager's unironic review of Artemis Fowl on reddit?

>>6681609
>actual film

Oh fucking please, film is the shittiest artistic medium on earth (yes, literally including video games). You couldn't name a properly patrician film if you tried.

Cue the butthurt baneposters from /tv/