/lit/ - Literature

>>12042603
>>12042476
Based and redpilled

>>11146898
I will not because the time for that has passed, not since the 40's (or whatever neo-nazis believe), but many centuries ago. This civilization is doomed. Now is not the time to focus on politics. This is the time to prepare for the future to protect one's own bloodline and a time to shitpost on 4chan.

>>10849390
>I'll just say /pol/. That'll shut them up
Not everybody who disagrees with you is /pol/. Believe it or not, when Evola was alive /pol/ didn't even exist

>>10832558
>>10832555
Great and powerful governments, Commanding Peace, come into existence only in ages of decadence; when nations are on the downward grade. If the human animal lives a natural, cleanly life, out on the plains and forests away, where oceans rollers crash along the shore, or on the banks of the pouring rivers he requires no police-force to 'protect' him — no usurious Jew to rob him of his harvests — no tax-gathering legislators to vote away his property, and no 'priests of the Idol' to 'save' his soul.

It is false standards of morality that debase and enfeeble individuals, tribes and nations. First, in obedience to some sovereign code, they lose their hardihood and increase their numbers. Then that all may live, they become laborious, submissive to Regulations; and finally-with Death held up by priestcraft as a fearsome Terror, all personal valor fades away. Thus nations of spaniels are manufactured.

The normal man is the man that loves and feasts and fights and hunts, the predatory man. The abnormal man is he that toils for a master, half-starves, and 'thinks' — the Christly dog. The first is a perfect animal; the second, a perfect — monster.

>>10823745
Except anprims are dillusioned leftists who believe all tribes were feminist utopias where no one did any work, Redbeard is a Tribalist, not an anprim.
>>10823658
not an argument
>>10823682
>implying Nietzche is good
>>10823689
yeah it does

his work is good, it's a shame that hippy, civilised beta scum like Zerzan have tried to appropriate his work


Nature is war, and War is nature, and that's a good thing

>>10782511
>anprim
anprim is anti nature. they believe Tribes were peaceful equal feminist utopias.

Tribes were warlike, fought heavily and raided constantly. that's how it should be, unlike the anprim changing of our history.

>"Did you deem yourself strong, because you were able to twist the heads off civilized folk, poor weaklings with muscles like rotten string? Hell! Break the neck of a wild Cimmerian bull before you call yourself strong. I did that, before I was a full-grown man...!"

>>10779014
>>10779028
Barbarism is the natural state of mankind," the borderer said, still staring somberly at the Cimmerian. "Civilization is unnatural. It is a whim of circumstance. And barbarism must always ultimately triumph

He was concerned only with the naked fundamentals of life. The warm intimacies of small, kindly things, the sentiments and delicious trivialities that make up so much of civilized men's lives were meaningless to him. A wolf was no less a wolf because a whim of chance caused him to run with the watch-dogs. Bloodshed and violence and savagery were the natural elements of the life Conan knew; he could not, and would never, understand the little things that are so dear to civilized men and women.

>>10629900
Good, I thought you were the Anarcho primitivst "tribal people were all hippie feminist free lovers who worked for three hours a day" kind of Unabomber kind.


Great and powerful governments, Commanding Peace,
come into existence only in ages of decadence; when nations are on
the downward grade. If the human animal lives a natural, cleanly
life, out on the plains and forests away, where oceans rollers crash
along the shore, or on the banks of the pouring rivers he requires no
police-force to 'protect' him — no usurious Jew to rob him of his
harvests — no tax-gathering legislators to vote away his property,
and no 'priests of the Idol' to 'save' his soul.

>>10598353
>t.urbanite (((national socialist)))

Not written after the 2000's, but The Conan the Barbarian short stories have similar themes. Conan is a barbarian, is superior to the Civilised man, etc. Civilised men are viewed as weak, untrrustworthy cowards, and men from a "barbaric" background are viewed as superior, stronger,stealthier, faster, more intelligent, more instinctual.

The author, Robert E Howard, was heavily influenced by the wild west and western novels, especially the "rugged individuality" of cowboys, indians, etc. On the asepect of his political beliefs, he was a might is right libertarian, the Conan novels were a way for him to show the "superiority" of freedom and of uncivlised people.

You'll have a hard time finding fiction stories with those kind of pagnan, anti civ values. Might is right by Ragnar Redbeard and the voice of our ancestors by Wulf sorenson are non fiction but have most of those values that you're looking for.

And you'll have an extremely difficult time looking for works made after the 2000's like this. This kind of thinking was popular by libertariansocial darwinists in 19th century america and by Volkisch groups in 1920s Germany.

>>10546827
Not an argument. Glory exists. The gods grant access to their halls if you live with glory.
>>10546952
Thinking is "muh philosophising", "muh what is good and evil", etc. The Barbaric man does not think, he acts, when he is hungry he kills, with no regard or thought, when he is angry he fights, when he is thirsty he drinks, and when he wants a woman he takes one.

>>10445818
>>10445819
>>10445824
he still managed to fight most of the world, civilised man