/lit/ - Literature

>>20572308
>Anyone who speaks of communism in Italy today is a corporatist impatient about the necessary delays in the development of an idea that is the temperate correction of the communist utopia and the most logical and therefore truer statement than what one can expect from communism.>>20572331
>Some forms of fascism might have a strong degree of citizen control of the economic and political decisions through corporative councils, and every form of it wants a high degree of participation of the citizens into the state.
This is how marx thought to achieve communism.

>>19340546
Butters. You ARE the state.

>>19316261
>Are there any books that synthesize the former's philosophy with the latter's economics?
Gentile, probably. Considering that he never rejected Marx's economics as far as I am aware.
>Anyone who speaks of communism in Italy today is a corporatist impatient about the necessary delays in the development of an idea that is the temperate correction of the communist utopia and the most logical and therefore truer statement than what one can expect from communism.

—'Speech to the Italians' Rome, June 24th, 1943

>>19200962
>Esoteric Fascism
Who came up with this stupid fucking meme.

>>19151349
Another thing I would like to add is that we, as living organisms are limited in how we experience the universe, time as we know it only makes sense from our perspective, but there may very well be other ways to perceive the universe which is limited by the 5 senses we have.

Idealism isn't about "magic" it's about perception, and developing a framework of understanding without making apriori assumptions. Materialism in fact, is not even logical in that it posits the existence of the the universe as we experience it apriori, when it is clearly our consciousness which first creates the universe in the way we experience it.

You logically cannot build an epistemology through materialism. Let alone make moral judgements.

>>16949158
>dictatorial nationalism
>.. this State that realizes itself in the consciousness and will of
the individual, rather than being imposed from on high, cannot have
the same relationship with the people imagined by Nationalism. They
imagined that the State corresponded with the nation, and conceived
both as an already existing entity that it was not necessary to create,
but which it was only necessary to come to know. That preexisting
entity required a ruling class, characteristically intellectual, that
sensed that entity, that first required to be known, understood, ap¬
praised, and exalted. The authority of the State was not a product,
but a presupposition. It could not depend on the people, in fact, the
people depended on the State. The authority that the people were
required to recognize was the very precondition of life. Without that
authority, sooner or later, one would have to acknowledge that sur¬
vival was not possible. The Nationalist state was aristocratic state,
that constructed itself out of the force it inherited from its origin,
that made it valued by the masses. The Fascist State, on the other
hand, is a popular state, and, in that sense, a democratic State par
excellence. The relationship between the State and the individual is
not that between it and one or the other citizen, but with every citi¬
zen. Every citizen shares a relationship with the State that is so inti¬
mate that the State exists only in so far as it is made to exist by the
citizen. Thus, its formation is a product of the consciousness of each
individual, and thus of the masses, in which the power of the State
consists

>>16949091
>The authority of the State was not a product, but a presupposition. It could not depend on the people, in fact, the people depended on the State… The Fascist state, on the other hand, is a popular state, and, in that sense, a democratic State par excellence… Every citizen shares a relationship with the State and is so intimate that the State exists only in so far as it is made to exist by the citizen.

>>16509655
Not a fasxist
>>16509701
He's not a liber, he's not a fasxist. He's a walking meme.

STOP SPREADING MEMES ABOUT IDEOLOGIES YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT.
That goes for everyone, pls. For the sake of my heart.

>>16407980
Why do hegelians never talk about this guy

>>16346481
The alternative is fascism, unironically.

>fights for the release of anti-fascist intellectuals
>gets shot by antifa
what the fuck is your problem