/lit/ - Literature

>>13428137
>the scientific kinds
What's the line of demarcation?

>>11892691
>mfw science is a method
Oh my how mad are you to type all this shit? Has pointing out your naive faith in 'science' and 'rationality' touched a nerve? Poor little positivist babby has been confronted with the limitations of his faith for the first time and he's throwing his toys out of the pram.
>One draws conclusion from evidence, the other posits truths based on nothing. Every piece of religious dogma requires you to just accept them as true
Science is exactly the same, unless you can prove causality or math, or that the future will resemble the past. Which you can't, you take them on faith. Because science is a faith. And you have faith in science.

>>10458645
>not getting into Dadaist epistemology first

Daily reminder that the project of aristocrats/egoists like Nietzsche and Rand is to talk the masses out of pursuing their own self-interest.

You know what the next step is, right?

Anybody read Feyerabend here? He's the successor to Popper and Kuhn in philosophy of science. I'm finishing Against Method now.

no, he's not Bukowski

>sophism
>"convincing-but-flawed-logic"
when will this meme end, the sophists were right

ahahah good one

Read this guy, it might help you, I mean, look at that posture.