/lit/ - Literature

>>11853611
>>>/reddit/

>>10171653
Please tell me you are the poster with the tiny dog brain.

>>9903508
>CLIFF INTERNET DEFENCE FORCE GET OUT
>REEEEEEEEEEEE
Run along now , little pseud. You'll grow out of this meme Lord phase eventually

>>9898626
>Dude just stop being schizophrenic
>Biology doesn't effect behavior
Wtf i love communism now

>>9433689
>tiny dog brain (btfo)
The main difference between my contempt and your own is that I do not let mine influence the actual substance of my posts. Multiple times now you have let you condescension lead you to say things that simply are not accurate.
Feel free to read a book sometime: https://joeclark.org/peterson/peterson_mapsofmeaning-en.pdf
>Most of the scholars who have followed his lead have adopted this central assumption, at least implicitly. This position requires some modification. We do model facts, but we concern ourselves with valence, or value It is therefore the case that our maps of the world contain what might be regarded as two distinct types of information – sensory, and affective. It is not enough to know that something is. It is equally necessary to know what it signifies. It might even be argued that animals – and human beings – are primarily concerned with the affective or emotional significance of the environment.
(p. 30)
Doesn't sound like a pop-philosopher quote or Nazi anecdote to me. If you're curious, he goes into more detail on the idea in the book that you didn't read.
>I have no problem with a discussion of his arguments
Aside from the fact that for most of the thread you've made it very clear you have a problem with a discussion related to Peterson happening on /lit/:
>Q: Why are these threads deleted?
>A: Because he's a fucking beggar... why is this garbage being posted in /lit/???
You have an interesting way of showing acquiescence.
>I still think OP's post is abhorrent
Again, there are specific circumstances surrounding this particular man. Unfortunate ones? Yes. I, like you, would rather not see seven Peterson threads full to the brim of shitposting. But considering the mods themselves have been pulled into this issue, it's entirely reasonable to discuss thread deletion while also setting the ground for an actual approach to Peterson. Also, I still don't care what you think about OP, I'm mainly concerned with your obsession over /pol/.
>the conversation goes on
I'm staying up until 3:00 AM to watch a bunch of socially inept losers play video games for a prize pool that's bigger than my annual paycheck will ever be. Is that what you wanted to know? Why I'm still here? I've got nothing better to do for a while. Why are you here? To get away from /pol/? Would you say you're succeeding right now?

Reply to me again. I've got time to spare and apparently so do you.