/lit/ - Literature

>>13775870
>stop showing that liberals support left wing identity politics. it goes against my belief that liberals are right wing.

>>13744669
>What the flipping fuck? I read 1984 and Animal Farm in school and quote them to this day. christ dude, dicatorship?? that shit's messed up. if only they had these profound literary works, they would accept pluralism, democracy and homosexuality. ORWELL WAS RIGHT!

>>13744229
>"the act of seeing" is just a language game
Materialism is so incoherent that materialists deny the act of seeing.

>>13651249
Dude. You can't frickin say this. Vatican II outlawed the practice. How dare you try to radicalize Catholics on the internet. I'll help you grasp this, your ideas are dangerous and stupid.

>>13649615
dude, smoking is fucking bad and literally will give you cancer. how stupid can you be to inhale LITERAL PLANT MATTER. i dont take anyone who ever smoked tobacco seriously. literally show me one influential tobacco smoker. I'll wait.

>>13622231
>what the fuck man. smoking will freakin kill you!
>he's smoking literal gaddam cancer sticks, the FDA has proven, case closed proven that smoking causes cancer. This is not up for debate. It is settled science like dude, at a god damn gas station, holly flippin fuck. I don't believe you that the embers aren't hot enough dude, you can't take the chance, I mean this guy is reckless, and is going to go up in smoke literally with his nasty tobacco addiction because he must be addicted that's the only logical explanation for smoking cigarettes, they have no benefits whatsoever. I never touched them once in my life!

I for one, HATE reading.

>>>if I post wojak faces instead of arguing I don't have to provide any answers to my mental gymnastics

>read a book review written by a literal faggot leftist
>he quotes a part in the book where a teen male calls someone a faggot
>"This book is sexist. I know that characters don't have to reflect the author's views, but this is sad especially for a YA book"
And that's why literature is dead bros

>>13471088
>not wanting to bully materialists

>>13462744
>why, yes, i'm obssessed with pop culture so much that people who complain about blacks in movies or whatever live rent free in my head 24/7, how could you tell?

>Be thankful that I don't save those shitty onions wojack images or I would have attached that with a quote of your reply

>NOOOO!!! WE CAN'T GO BACK TO PRE-INDUSTRIAL CIVILIZATION. LIKE, DO YOU WANT KIDS TO DIE WITHOUT VACCINES? WE NEED TECHNOLOGY!

>>13444772
>So it's true, then? That's your whole argument? lmao we must cease to exist because pain is bad while totally ignoring that pleasure is also a possibility?

>>13424225
>He said some rather idiotic things about women also.

>STOP THROWING BOOKS AT ME JUST BECAUSE I READ ENDERS GAME DOES NOT MEAN MY TASTE IS BAD!

>i am so, SO fucking sick of wojakposters. holy shit. i never thought something would surpass pepe in obnoxiousness
>you people look dumber than whoever you're trying to mock, you look like your brain can only process things through memes. it's telling you never have a response longer than 1 line

>i am so, SO fucking sick of wojakposters. holy shit. i never thought something would surpass pepe in obnoxiousness
>you people look dumber than whoever you're trying to mock, you look like your brain can only process things through memes. it's telling you never have a response longer than 1 line

>NO DUDE, YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO BE A BASED 140 IQ TRAD CATH WHO READS FESER AND AQUINAS

>ME CHRISTIAN

>ALL RELIGIONS ARE EPIC DUDE, IM THOMAS MERTON AND A MASSIVE REDDIT KEKOLD

>>13160367
Not an argument degenerate.

>>13140546

>1 million books I want to read
>never read any
FUCK