/lit/ - Literature

>>22836270
>Disliking Tolkien and his works is one of the easiest indicators that someone is incapable of deep, critical thought.

>>21449074
>t.

>>21436007
>using concrete living humans as means for abstract utopia and not ends in themselves

>>18447446
>christcuck

>Buddhism is more of a philosophy than a religion

>Damn this thread really brought out all the materialist bugmen.

>>16806473
>Smoking is bad

>>16786682
>Dude i've read all of my books on my kindle and i've NEVER EVER used a pdf format, because epub or mobi was always to be found and is far superior to PDF for ereaders, that guy is either trolling or he knows jack shit about how ereaders work

>This is BULLSHIT!

>>16517025
>Looking down on others will always make you a bitch, no matter how talented you are (if even).

>>16352620
>If libraries didn't exist we would still be bloodborne mobs you fucking idiot.

>>16246407
>Fuck that son of a bitch, he ruined one of the world's greatest athletes

>>16011470
>this town fucking sucks for dating

>>15997903
>The zenith of Japan's power came with the abolition of the samurai class.
[Weakling cope and wrong]

>>15920582
>That would be fucking insane.
>Lmao, like you know! Weird manic autist pseud.
>Again, no one would ever do that.
>The literate people ITT know you are unfamiliar with Catholic teaching.
>Why are you doing this?

>representative republics with public elections aren't democracies because uhhhhhh words different.

>>15759815
>is this a dog whistle

>>15736786
>Why do you want to become a cult leader?

>>15702500
Computers are natural moron. We came from nature and we made computers so computers exist naturally.

>>15575558
Living embodiment of

>Do you have a source on that?

>Source?

>A source. I need a source.

>Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.

>No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.

>You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.

>Do you have a degree in that field?

>A college degree? In that field?

>Then your arguments are invalid.

>No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.

>Correlation does not equal causation.

>CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.

>You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.

>Nope, still haven't.

>>15556506
>Why are you such an asshole dude?

>>15547692
>Wow. What an idiot.
t. coomer with a wrecked prefrontal cortex

https://youtube.com/watch?v=hv-ODnbbP7U

>>15537395
ASSHOLE. - signed OP

>>15507297
>do you need a doctor?