/lit/ - Literature

>>10826499
>but I believe
Pixie dust. It's what faggots use to convince themselves is truth. Why do cinephiles not think about their medium. Composition in an imagistic and pictorial sense is stealing from painting and other visual arts. The medium Griffith, Flaherty, Eisenstein, and Stroheim occupy is one of phenomenological presentation (reality). What cinephiles crave is distortion of reality, but the prior seek to create and capture a layered reality. The medium is formally limited and hinged on the dualistic nature of life, decoupage is what matters. Give me a single profound quality existing in any films like the one in linked post.

Flaherty resurrected tradition within selected sects of peoples that had moved on, he made peoples enact their own myths. Flaherty equalized these elements into a transparent continuity that was entirely divorced by the nature of his rigorous studies. He invested and sought connection to the metastructural framework of continuous reality therefore I'm always hesitant to call anything by Flaherty, Stroheim, or Griffith a film, but if Moana occupied that medium, it would be the very best of it without a doubt, no question. Flaherty has suppressed conflict, Flaherty suppressed juxtaposition, the prolongued sound implementation only enhances. A non-diegetic done through gestated diegetic capture. All of his elements are divorced and suppressed yet still united, the sense of temporal continuity as well is entirely divorced in Moana. Flaherty long achieved his sought distillation of essence, but Moana in particular quesitons the essence of life without ever asking the question. Every element in a Flaherty work is divorced but they are united together contrapuntally to ask the eternal questions regarding time, space, and history with allusions to a future enacted in the present. The genius of Griffith and Flaherty is their search for the ultimate suppression of conflict, the abstraction of conflict to attain intrajuxtaposition. This is why this dumdum >>93842054 considers Que Viva Mexico a failure. Because it is Eisenstein fully learning from Isn't Life Wonderful and Moana. Searching for the answer, the truth of a peoples' culture and its effects on their structuralist power stasis. He is no longer looking for the physical but the metaphysical.