/lit/ - Literature

>>21705737
Based Springer reader.

>>12879529
I read the first book (1924-29) of the five parts, since that is the only one i was interested in (i have the others lying around).
He obviously glorifies himself immensly, an I didn't care too much about the ebin relationships he had with the girls that loved him so much.
I found it interesting to see how a cripple managed to become the the Propagandaminister for NatSoc germany (and if he were on the right side of history, be a looked up to figure for his innovation in methods and abilities in the field).
I don't know if I can recommend it though.
Intersting to see what books he read, though he rarely wrties any serious criticism on them in the diary or greater impressions; though he does to that for specific authors or figures like Wagner.
I enjoyed it and found it fascinating, doubt I will pick up the rest till I have read everything else that is essential for my own personal progress in life though.
>>12879538
Most of the book is him pretending to be a realistic chad though fyi.

>>7956481
It glorifies a behavior that is unnatural1 and unhealthy1 to a demographic that is vulnerable and easily impressionable. These boys haven't matured yet (hormones), and are not developing masculine behavior that will be necessary later in life. It subverts and subtly knocks natural1 institutions and necessary gender roles.
1. Our biology goes against the progressive idea that our genitals are the only big difference in our psychological hard-wiring. By promoting a society where we are born as a blank slate and are able to become anything, free of natural institutions, qualities and roles is irresponsible. Can you honestly claim that trans-people are as capable as parents, just as mentally healthy? Or do you scoff at the valuable role heterosexual marriage has played in almost all society? These people should be allowed to live their life, but should not be normalized or considered brave.