/lit/ - Literature

Has there ever been written a serious and coherent critique of post-structuralist philosophy, eg. Deleuze's differential ontology? Most of modern literature trying to critique it seems to do so either on the grounds of vague language and incoherence, dismiss them as "post-modern neo-marxist" boogeymen, or merely critique parts not even (think Sokal, etc.) relevant to the philosophy itself.

The field of philosophy seems to be mostly dead, with the post-structuralist critiques of language and political institutions' claim to legitimacy being the latest entries. None of the current age "philosophers" (Peterson, Harris and the IDW or left-equivalent types) have (IMO) any comprehensive and satisfying works, only pop-philosophy/psychology bastard children or jumbled garbage like Maps of Meaning. (Although the ideas in MoM themselves are interesting and can be consumed through Peterson's lectures more easily) There's nothing to build on what's been said during the last century.

What the fuck, this is pseudery to an obscene level.