[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.22880608 [View]
File: 395 KB, 1480x720, 2023-05-29_16.33.54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22880608

>>22880555
I dont use latex, I use definitional abstractions. You know....NUMBER THEORY. Discerning the difference is meaningless to me, your effort was noted, you failing to even use latex is now noted as well.

Youre not even a student...youre some random jackass with "strong opinions" based on pure egocentric emotions, like a toddler.

>LMAOLMAOLMAO
Youre disgustingly retarded and vapid.

>> No.22853307 [View]
File: 395 KB, 1480x720, 2023-05-29_16.33.54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22853307

>>22853294
>You're not a physicist
>constanting maling claims about thing you couldnt know and have zero qualifications discern credibility
MENTAL. ILLNESS.

t.Mathematical Physicist, Number Theory majored

>> No.22790069 [View]
File: 395 KB, 1480x720, 2023-05-29_16.33.54.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22790069

>>22790057
Oh, and he is wrong the definition of Number Theory.

His understanding is that of a college student who only learned what was on the test. Definitional alterations is alsp "Number Theory".

My book on Number Theory could be entirely about the number 1, no 2, nothing else...JUST 1.

1+1= would be an unsolvable equation...

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]