/lit/ - Literature

Neither Anarchy nor Totalitarianism are our end goals, but they are means to an end. Futurism, the path to a Fascist Society though Anarchy, demands the annihilation of the existing temporal social order and its institutions in order to start from scratch so that a more organic rebirth can occur straight though all the natural organic processes.

the other path to a Fascist society, though totalitarianism, means utilizing the mechanical state Leviathan in order to create a protective outer shell that would fall away once a new generation has been grown that would by default act according to what was previously enforced by mechanical means of total control

Fascism though totalitarianism allows for the weak average commoner to be a part of fascist society, but he is constantly constrained by the system to make sure he does not cause any damage to the restoration process or "incubation" of the future generation. this ensures that the new generation recives the proper education and understanding required to no longer need the strict control of totalitarianism, thus once the old weak generation dies off the system can be safely dismantled by the newer generation.

Fascism through Anarchy requires much higher standards, it demands everyone who wishes to become part of the natural restoration to be capable of self-discipline, of having their order originate form within, otherwise they are worthless and need to be babysat all the time. thus fascism though Anarchy is more radical and does not tolerate weakness and thus the weak have no place. it also places less emphasis on the "nation" as nationalism merely serves as a vehicle of the weak in many cases.
the Totalitarian on the other hand requires nationalism as it represents the widest extension of deeper "tribal" kinship bonds, and since humans have yet to bridge the gap where we can have intense feelings of care for non-kin the "nation" becomes a necessary fiction for the sake of unity.