/lit/ - Literature

>>13418356
>>13418303

Well I for one enjoyed you two poster's exchange, minus the belligerence.

It raises a few questions for me; why does there need to be an axiomatic reconciliation of esoteric principles and scientific metaphysics in the first place? Not a rhetorical question. Isn't this just an exercise in futility?
AND
What (if anything) is it about Perennialism that makes it particularly easy to dismiss it as "dogmatic" as has been done numerous times in the thread? I can see how exoteric matters can be labelled as dogmatic, but aren't esoteric traditions based on a foundation of truth-seeking and unknowability? Or is the eso/exo demarcation not as clear as we're lead to believe?