/lit/ - Literature

>>19198728


A STORY IS A NARRATION; A LIST IS NOT A NARRATION, THEREFORE NOT A STORY.

THINK BEFORE POSTING.

I DID NOT KNOW THAT THERE IS A CIVILIZATION CALLED: «AMERICA»; WHERE IS IT?

>>18116513


?

YOU ARE IGNORANT & DELUDED IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT THE FREEMASONS HAVE LOST IMPORTANCE; THE CURRENT SECULAR VALUES ARE FREEMASONIC IN ORIGIN —FREEMASONS: UNIMPORTANT? WE LIVE IN THE WORLD THAT THEY HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTING FOR THREE CENTURIES; WE LIVE IN AN ILLUMINISTIC WORLD OF THEIR MAKING.

>>18091503


?

>>18021491

>«JEANS».

>SOUTHAMERICAN.
>ANYTHING AKIN TO «SPICE GIRLS».


...

EL RECITARLE POEMAS AJENOS A ALGUIEN ES DE LO MÁS CUTRE Y DESHONESTO QUE ALGUIEN PUEDE HACER; CUÁL ES LA LÓGICA? ACASO QUIENES HACEN ESTO CREEN QUE POR RECITAR POESÍA ESCRITA POR OTRA PERSONA VAN A ENAMORAR A SU PERSONA DE INTERÉS?

>>17527895


WHY IS A PORTRAIT OF GUSTAVO ADOLFO BÉCQUER ON THE COVER OF THAT EDITION OF: «THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GAY»?

>>17446435
>... the 19th century was the absolute peak of human history[.]
>I can't imagine a better time to live in, and it all went downhill since then.


YOU ARE, EITHER: IGNORANT, OR: DELUSIONAL.

YOUR IMAGINATION MUST BE IN DIRECT CORRELATION WITH YOUR INTELLECTION, AND YOUR DELECTION.

>>17315688


AYN RAND WAS A SUPERRATIONALISTIC PERSONALIST; FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE WAS AN IRRATIONALISTIC ANIMIST —IF YOU THINK THAT THEY ARE MUTUALLY SIMILAR, OR PHILOSOPHICALLY AKIN, YOU COMPREHEND NEITHER.

THE NOTION OF A HYPOTHETICAL, FALLACIOUS «RETURN TO NATURE» IS ONE OF MANY ROMANTICISTIC PLAGUES SPAWNED BY ILLUSTRISTIC IRRATIONALISM —WHAT IS «NATURAL LIFE»? LOOK AT ANIMALS, AND THERE THE ANSWER IS EVIDENT; HUMAN LIFE IS CONTRANATURAL, NOT NATURAL.

ASKING FOR «GOOD "SELFHELP" BOOKS» IS AKIN TO ASKING FOR «GOOD "PROTESTANT" THEOLOGY».

>>17065861


?

YOUR ASSERTION WOULD MAKE SENSE ONLY IF IT IS PRESUPPOSED THAT METAMODERNISM IS, OR SHOULD BE, ANTIMODERNISTIC —A PRESUPPOSITION THAT IS NOT ONLY ABSURD, BUT ALSO ERRONEOUS.

I THINK THAT YOU MAY BE MISUNDERSTANDING WHAT MODERNISM IS.

DE QUE NADA EN SU VIDA PASA

QUÉJASE INANE EL PUSILÁNIME,

MIENTRAS QUE LA VIDA LE PASA.

«THIS GENERATION» REFERS TO THE SÆCVLVM MVNDI.

STOP REPOSTING THIS THREAD.

>>16868324
>... the most difficult book written in English[.]


LA ÚNICA MANERA EN QUE UNA OBRA HECHA EN LENGUA INGLESA PUDIERA SER «DIFICULTOSA DE LEERSE» SERÍA SI ESTUVIERA MAL ESCRITA, O SI FUERA VERBORREA SIN SENTIDO, YA QUE LA LENGUA INGLESA ES LENGUA PARA CIEGOS, PARA LOS TARADOS ONTOLÓGICOS DE EL MUNDO.

>>16775008


1. THE TOPIC OF THE THREAD READS: «Spain».

2. THE FACT THAT YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT MIGUEL DE CERVANTES SAAVEDRA DID NOT WRITE ANYTHING ELSE OF SIGNIFICANCE IS RIDICULOUS, AND EVIDENCE OF YOUR ABYSMAL IGNORANCE.


>>16775010
>arguably the greatest work of western literature


YES, THAT IS WHAT IS WRITTEN —AND?

>>16721855
>Barbarism is the natural state of mankind.

BARBARISM IS THE NATURAL STATE OF THE BARBARIAN.


>Civilization is unnatural.

CIVILIZATION IS CONTRANATURAL.

AND?


>It is a whim of circumstance...

CIVILIZATION IS THE RESULT OF A CONCERTED, DESIGNED, PURPOSEFUL, AND INTENTIONAL OPERATION OF IMPOSITION, AND CONSTRUCTION, OF NOBLE HUMAN ORDER AGAINST, AND IN SPITE OF, THE FATALITY OF NATURE.

THERE IS NOTHING WHIMSICAL, NOR CIRCUMSTANTIAL, REGARDING CIVILIZATION; CIVILIZATION IS ACTUAL, NOT ACCIDENTAL


>…and barbarism must always ultimately triumph.

IT IS OF COURSE THAT A BARBARIAN WOULD OPINE THAT...

>>16700036


I KNOW THAT YOU ARE PROBABLY SEVENTEEN YEARS OLD, AND THAT YOU HAVE NOT BEEN ON «FOURCHAN(NEL)» FOR MORE THAN A MONTH, BUT KNOW THAT REALITY IS NOT CONTINGENT TO YOUR EMOTIONS, OR CAPRICES; SOMETHING DOES NOT ALTER ITS ONTOLOGY MERELY BECAUSE YOU DISLIKE IT; SOMEONE DOES NOT LEAVE MERELY BECAUSE YOU DISLIKE HIM.

>>16684527
>... postmodernism/post-structuralism...
>... be sincere and don't stir shit...


LA ESQUIZOFRENIA DE EL HIPERMODERNO...

>>16674852


OK, SOULLESS FLESHVESSEL.

>>16660548
>Bartolomé de Las Casas wrote a book, I think it was called "Historia de la destrucción de Las Indias"


>RECOMENDANDO FICCIÓN BASURA ANTIHISPÁNICA.


...

>>16629129


1. BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU.

2. YOU ARE CONFLATING BEINGNESS WITH EXPERIENCE.

>>16589181


MISS FECAL IS A REPULSIVE SCHIZOPATH WITH NO SENSE OF BEAUTY, OR DIVINITY; IF YOU READ THE MORBID CHIMERAS THAT SHE RENDERS INTO TEXT, AND THINK: «THIS IS GOOD; SHE IS A GOOD POET», YOU ARE AS ILL AS SHE IS.

>>16582148
>based or Reddit cringe?


YOUR MAKING THIS QUESTION, AND USING THOSE TERMS IS WHAT IS CRINGEWORTHY & WORTHY OF «REDDIT».