/lit/ - Literature

>>9620298
Yeah. I get that. Right now I feel like I'm in a kind of a circle, where I like Lacanian analysis to dismantle modernity, schizoanalysis to dismantle psychoanalysis and then I wind up back in formless-nondual land to deal with schizoanalysis, which eventually points me back in the direction of, okay, Capital, I can handle you now. Until I can't and start talking about guilt again.

Baudrillard is wicked. Debord also but Baudrillard has literary flair from here to eternity. I'm shilling Klossowski left and right these days too.

>>9616184
Me too anon, me too. I've read a fair bit of continental philosophy, especially Baudrillard, and Klossowski was an influence on him and many others. But I hadn't actually read any of his work until now. I can see how much Klossowski's thought was a part of Baudrillard's work. I hope/think/desire that this will be of interest to /lit/ in many ways, but you can't force these things.

What was your previous thread about? What aspects of his thought did you want to bring up?