/lit/ - Literature

>>22207240
NTA, but lol.
Believing the Universe we all know came out of nothing and all its foundations are nothing but a product of an explosion is actually way crazier than to believe in a God as the prime mover. The number of "elements" is not indicative of a validation of an argument.

>>20056000
reeeee souless trips

>>11467103
According to reductionistic materialists, all you need to do is slap a bunch of molecules together and sentience somehow arises.

>umm lol no consciousness being somehow inherent to matter? that’s spooky panpsychism
>umm it just arises somehow when you put together a bunch of non-sentient atoms :^)

>>9706318
>>9706331
>>9706359
>>9706373

>>9177322
c-c-c s l-l-l-lewis

>>7465864

>>5842912

>uh oh I have nothing useful to say because my imaginary friend and I just got BTFO

>>5842921

>As there is no contradicting evidence contained within the bible, your argument is with fallible people, not an infallible God.

Every single word of god has been transcribed to humans to give to other humans, thus there has been no definite contact with this "God" character other than these fallible humans.

There is literally not a single theistic argument that has substance.

To be a theist is to play mind-gymnastics and grasping for straws as to continue desperately to cling to their faith for as long as they can until their rationality overcomes them.

Man thinks it can WILL god into existence, this is why religion is still around today, but as the god of gaps shrinks and shrinks in influence thanks to better education and technological advancement we will come out of this intellectual dark age better than before.

I don't intend to sound condescending. I am not saying you are stupid, I am just saying your beliefs are stupid.

>>5144619

>>4294158
>>4294158

>people who dont believe in a higher power, that we are a piece of

>Narrative is interrupted with or depends on footnotes

Why does this feel so good and which writer does this?