[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.5953445 [View]
File: 51 KB, 425x287, derrida1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5953445

>>5953413

>> No.5293927 [View]
File: 51 KB, 425x287, derrida1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5293927

>>5293895
>Oneself is a reality.
>reality

Oneself has no unity, it is a multiplicity. Drop Stirner, pick up Nietzsche.

>> No.5256511 [View]
File: 51 KB, 425x287, derrida1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5256511

>>5256147
Just a play on his word arche-writing or "writing before writing". Derrida's argument is that those core features that we ascribe to writing in the usual sense are actually in speech and even every other form of phenomena. He calls this core features arche-writing / writing before writing / writing in the general sense.
So it is not that thoughts are an origin, speech its copy and writing the copy of speech — making it a copy of a copy — but that arche-writing is always already before and in everything. This is a kind of deconstructionist reversal of primary and secondary.
As a challenge I'm applying this to the binary pair non-fiction/fiction. However, I need some text (from you anons) that tries to define this opposition to find deconstruction of it already at work in the text itself.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]