/lit/ - Literature

>>20043518
Yes, it is. But it's a much more complex form. And you can see that if you express it diagrammatically with hypostatic abstraction.

To the non-caucasian brain, honey IS sweet. That is to say, X is Y. This is very much Aristotles method of thought.

To the white brain, honey is in possession of the quality of sweetness. That is to say, Y inheres within X as a constituent element. This is more akin to the way Bacon, Gallileo, and Newton were thinking. It's more a statement of subjective experiential association than one of objective determination within a hierarchy of generalized abstractions.

It's why in science you find that all of the grunt work that simply requires checking figures, running preset experiments, and counting is done by Pajeet or Chang. Whereas anything that requires real creative thought is done exclusively by whites, Europeans, and Jews.

If pajeet drops something in a dark room, unless he's shown to use his mobile phone screen as a source of light he will never in a million years make that connection. Because phone equals communication device. X is Y.

A white person will under an identical situation immediately think ... "what in this room is in possession of "light" or the capacity to generate it? Well, my phone screen is in possession of "light" so I'll use that."

you should read a "difficult" author if you have a reason to care about them. I'd recommend this nice little video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBJTeNTZtGU

and if, without any philosophical prerequisites, you think those are worthwhile ideas that you want to learn more about, I'd recommend reading the standford encyclopedia of philosophy article on him and the Foucault Reader, an selection from some of his more popular books.

>everything is objective anon xD, pls never forget the fact that others have thought long and hard about various topics and that regardless of whether you have engaged with those ideas yourself, you must submit to their authority over you in all perspectives on science, art, conceptual philosophical discussion, and taste. You're not supposed to form your own ideas or thoughts silly, just accept that you are always wrong! or at least accept you're not me, because I'm an objective genius just like them :) *tips fedora*

>>5864826
>Vargas Chota
>Mejor que Borges